The Arrogance of Ignorance

They were a boy and a girl. Yellow, meagre, ragged, scowling,
wolfish; but prostrate, too, in their humility. Where
graceful youth should have filled their features out, and
touched them with its freshest tints, a stale and shrivelled
hand, like that of age, had pinched, and twisted them, and
pulled them into shreds. Where angels might have sat
enthroned, devils lurked, and glared out menacing. No
change, no degradation, no perversion of humanity, in any
grade, through all the mysteries of wonderful creation, has
monsters half so horrible and dread.

Scrooge started back, appalled. Having them shown to him
in this way, he tried to say they were fine children, but
the words choked themselves, rather than be parties to a lie
of such enormous magnitude.

‘Spirit. are they yours.’ Scrooge could say no more.

‘They are Man’s,’ said the Spirit, looking down upon
them. ‘And they cling to me, appealing from their fathers.
This boy is Ignorance. This girl is Want. Beware them both,
and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy,
for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the
writing be erased. Deny it.’ cried the Spirit, stretching out
its hand towards the city. ‘Slander those who tell it ye.
Admit it for your factious purposes, and make it worse.
And abide the end.’

– Charles Dickens, “A Christmas Carol”


As-Salaam wa Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatahu,

Alhamdulillah. I’m writing this regarding the attack on Islamic “traditionalism” by the leaders of progressive Islam and the lemmings who follow them. From the current trend, I think ‘traditionalism’ may have beaten out ‘fundamentalism’ for top spot on the “Dirtiest Word in Religion” list. An intelligent response may fly right over the cuckoo’s nest if the intended audience be of the Eteraz’s and Manji’s and Ayaan Ali Hirsi’s of the World. Their PHD’s in the farce of “exposing” the dangerous ills of ‘cattle-driven’ Islam,( and whitewashing the crimes of Islam’s self-declared enemies), are just duplicitous badges of “boldness” pinned on a headless-chicken. They tout & peddle this chicken to the masses of wide-eyed, fence-sitting spectators, calling it progressivism. But what is this progressivism? I may have an idea.

It’s the neo-syndrome of blameless non-conformism which has become an integral ingredient in the recipe for liberal democracy in this age. But to what end? When all is said and done, the circular logic of these “revolutionaries” seeks again to be part & parcel of the elite body of the Intellectual Cream. Or at least a group of like-minded dissenters. Ah! Acceptance!

The democratic value system, especially in this country, has been eroded and replaced by the hard and fast rule of ‘desensitization to all which was once cherished’. Be it religious, or racial sensitivities, or just the universally accepted code of human decency. Not immediately stepping on something you don’t understand is considered ‘weak’ and ‘behind-the-times’. For those who understand – It is clear: When nothing is sacred, and you’re not bound by adhering to the principles of courtesy, then acts like Defecating on the Cross become Art, sold to the highest bidder. Anyone who disagrees is obviously an enemy of free speech. Jyllands-Posten anyone?

So what happens when THAT becomes the norm, I wonder? What is happening here? Quite plainly, the abandonment of God in one’s life has ramifications. Turning oneself to Allah not only gives purpose and direction, but strength as well (guarding against depression, suicide, or at the other end of the spectrum – wild, uninhibited acts of appetite – all appetites). When that abandonment is on a pandemic level, and it’s endorsement bombards your brain from every channel available – an organized anarachy against traditional principles results, as is currently happening today. When the ego is given free-reign in a mob-based movement-the preoccupation of amusing oneself becomes the utmost priority and the focus of one’s existence.

Just read Eteraz’s essay on “The Hoor”, or as I call it – “Jackass” for the literati. Clearly a shill now, Eteraz descends into incoherent babble in his liberature, struggling to shock his audience into submission with each “progressive” sentence, as well as deigning to have a point to his purpose: Raucous attacks on the Qur’an, denigrating the mercies of Allah, and outright blasphemy drowned in the futile ambitions to make a name for oneself. What has he found with that piece of his, I wonder? A few seconds of euphoric pride? An outlet to vent his frustrations at his own ignorance or his ineptitude in finding the truth? Or just an exercise fueling a massive ego-pump of self-pleasuring proportions? Whatever it is, (All of the above?), maybe the real question we should be asking this guy is – “Are you happy?”

I may already know the answer. And for those who can think – you might know it as well. As long as we make an enemy of the one who is sustaining us with each breath, we can never be truly happy. These progressivists seek the love and acceptance of those they feel that can provide them with a liberated, unaccountable lifestyle – fearing no one and nothing. Invincibility…with a catch. What then if the Dons don’t receive their monthly protection money? Will these free-thinkers be strong enough, then to endure their wrath. Failing to realize that fearing creation at the expense of the creator is the real loss,…well,…is the Real Loss.

If they spent half of a neuron in half a minute to seek the love and acceptance of the One which gave them life, instead of trampling their own graves, (As He will eventually give them death) -, if they use even an atom of the intellects they carry in titles and certificates, in the years of education which brought them to this point, towards seeking the Sunnah (and keeping it once found) of the Holy Prophet(ASWS,) instead of daring to stand and point a finger(a middle one at that), to the Almighty and His Beloved, – they may realize what it means to submit. To be a Muslim. Maybe. If not, then, they may find the realities of an after-life to be indigestible. May Allah guide them before their souls are “liberated” from their bodies. I ask Allah to save us all from such a fate. For the sake of the Holy Prophet (ASWS), Sheykh Mevlana, and Sheykh Effendi. Ameen, Ya Rabbul Alameen. I’m going to follow this up with a Sohbet of Sheikh Effendi’s that is immediately relevant to the ‘progressive predicament’. Insh’Allah Rahman.

Was-Salaam wa Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatahu

“Holy Prophet (saw) is saying, ‘The second Jahiliyya is going to be worst than the first one.’ And this is what we are facing today. The second Jahiliyya time. He said that it is because people in the second Jahiliyya time will know certain knowledge and they are not going to accept anything from anyone. ”

– Sheikh Abdul Kerim al Hakkani al Kibrisi

*edit: I’ve removed the word apostate from this post, only because it reminded me of the story of Hazrat Umar(RA), and the Munafiq, and the reaction of the Holy Prophet(ASWS). I fear to be stricken from the company of Allah’s beloved by daring to walk on what the Prophet(ASWS), himself, considered “thin ice”. However, the rest of the post still stands – I feel the bankruptcy of self-assessment in this world needs some recognition, and progressivism needs to know, no matter how hard it shuts its eyes, and clicks its heels, the boundaries will remain. Respect the boundaries.

6 thoughts on “The Arrogance of Ignorance

  1. I like your writing in general, and will come here often and with an open mind. Out of deferrence for Shaykh Nazem, Shaykh Hisham, the Naqshbandi order and your particular writing style and considerable intellect.

    This post should be removed.

  2. As-Salaam wa Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatahu,

    Dear Blake,

    Jazak’Allah Khair for coming by. Insh’Allah, my door is always open. As my Sheykh says, “Welcome to those who come, Farewell to those who leave. Those who want to listen, may listen. Those who don’t: leave it. I will take it back home with me”

    Though you have mentioned My Sheykh Mevlana,(and those who have love for him, I can never turn my back on nor ever dislike), why would it please you to have this post removed? If you dislike what I’ve written, I dislike what is being written elsewhere. Why not ask him to take his down? So, this is my response to that. Alhamdulillah. Like I said, there is slander occurring out there. Though I appreciate your honesty, I’d rather you be honest with yourself – What would Sheykh Mevlana and Sheykh Effendi have me do? If you don’t already know – I will let the age of this post speak for itself. I may, in lieu of certain realizations, edit with an addendum. That is all however. Thank you for your comment. “Farewell”, Insh’Allah Rahman.

    Dear Edward,

    Jazak’Allah Khair for your words. May Allah bless you and yours.

    Both of you. Wa min Allahu Tawfeeq.

    Was-Salaam wa Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatahu

  3. waliakum asalaam

    I said I am coming here due to the respect I have for the others and for you. You write with authority.

    THEN I wrote, the post should be removed (or updated).

    You wrote there “I’m going to recant my position on you “clearly being an apostate”. ”

    So this site should agree. This is honesty in my opinion.

    Were you honest or was that final recant and other statements said with sarcasm?

    It is important for Muslims to put aside their difference. You and Yursil lead in the adab front. You are patient and kind in the face of hostility.

    But swapping insults with a calm smile is still nasty.

    Eteraz has a ego. So do we all. You are right, his intentions are good despite his methods.

    We should all, especially in the US where there are multitudes of very potent, unsatisfied and increasingly desperate enemies, try to get on and build firm coalitions against violent extremists on the one side and tyranny and malice towards our religion on the other.

    Viewed from this point, there are bigger fish to fry than Ali Eteraz.

    If there is anything on his site that is unbearable, I will certainly ask for it to be removed.

    I am no more to him than to you: just a remote friend.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s